Civic AI Audit

Where AI gets its election information

We asked AI products to compare the candidates in the races we followed, and recorded the sources they cited.

What we found

  1. Local news is the largest category, at 39% of cited links.
  2. The chatbots differ widely. Local news is 55% of the links cited by Perplexity and 25% for ChatGPT. ChatGPT web link counts are partial: our tool captured only some of the links shown.
  3. In the six races on our daily panel, the most-cited site is youtube.com, almost all of it from Gemini. The ten most-cited sites account for 21% of cited links there, counting each developer version equally.
  4. Sites can rise and fall quickly. Facebook went from 22% of the links cited by Gemini's developer version to 0% during this study, while YouTube held at about 10%. We do not yet know why.
What each chatbot cites
Share of cited links by type of source, for each chatbot
ChatbotLocal newsOther news and wire servicesCampaign and party sitesReference sitesGovernmentAdvocacy and lobbying groupsSocial mediaEverything else
Claude43%16%6%10%2%5%0%18%
Perplexity55%21%3%6%2%3%1%10%
Gemini26%9%16%15%4%9%14%7%
ChatGPT25%16%29%10%8%5%1%7%
Grok46%13%22%8%0%4%2%5%
Google Search44%14%0%1%1%1%36%2%

Share of cited links, by chatbot. Links per chatbot: Claude 112,649, Perplexity 99,592, Gemini 95,994, ChatGPT 52,645, Grok 1,407, Google Search 1,201. 96% of these links come from developer API versions rather than web apps, so these figures mostly describe the API versions. ChatGPT web link counts are partial: our tool captured only some of the links shown. The Grok row comes from SuperGrok, and its link counts are partial.

The 25 most-cited sites, and how each changed
SiteShare of linksBy weekFirst to last week
youtube.com 2.8% 2.3% to 2.9%
ajc.com 2.5% 2.8% to 2.3%
yahoo.com 2.5% 2.9% to 2.5%
texastribune.org 2.3% 2.1% to 2.0%
en.wikipedia.org 2.3% 2.4% to 2.1%
davidjolly.com 2.2% 2.3% to 2.0%
apnews.com 2.0% 1.9% to 2.5%
ballotpedia.org 1.7% 1.6% to 2.2%
actonforgovernor.com 1.6% 1.8% to 1.1%
facebook.com 1.5% 5.4% to 0.0%
wispolitics.com 1.5% 1.4% to 1.5%
cbsnews.com 1.4% 1.5% to 1.5%
fox5atlanta.com 1.2% 0.6% to 1.4%
foxnews.com 1.1% 1.3% to 1.1%
abdulforsenate.com 1.1% 1.0% to 0.9%
bridgemi.com 1.0% 0.8% to 1.2%
byrondonalds.com 1.0% 1.1% to 0.9%
axios.com 0.9% 1.3% to 0.6%
jamestalarico.com 0.9% 0.8% to 1.0%
wpr.org 0.9% 0.8% to 0.9%
statenews.org 0.8% 1.0% to 0.7%
vivekforohio.com 0.8% 1.0% to 0.6%
ontheissues.org 0.8% 0.8% to 0.9%
politifact.com 0.8% 1.0% to 0.7%
floridapolitics.com 0.8% 0.8% to 0.9%

The same daily questions in the same six races, on the developer versions of Claude, Gemini, ChatGPT, and Perplexity, each counting equally. Weeks of Oct 5, 2026 (partial) through Nov 2, 2026, on one scale. Earlier days used a different question set and are left out.

Facebook and YouTube in Gemini's citations

Facebook: 22% to 0%

YouTube: 9% to 10%

Share of links cited by Gemini's developer version, by week, on one scale. ChatGPT's and Claude's developer versions cite both sites rarely.

The version you use changes the sources you see

Free accounts on ChatGPT and Claude cite more local news than the same company's developer version. On Claude, the paid account cites more sources in nearly the same mix.

On ChatGPT, the paid account as we ran it cites campaign sites about 13 points less than a free account, and local news about 4 points more, on our daily questions, mostly from October. The gap was smaller on Nov 2–3, on few answers, and did not appear in other questions we asked on Nov 3.

Web app vs developer API

Local news as a share of cited links. Same question, same day.

Claude

Claude: local news share, API and web
Developer API 48%
Free web account 66%

ChatGPT

ChatGPT: local news share, API and web
Developer API 25%
Free web account 34%

ChatGPT web figures count only the links our tool captured, a subset of those shown.

Free vs paid

Share of cited links, web apps. Same question, same day, six races. The paid account as we ran it.

ChatGPT

ChatGPT: free and paid accounts
Campaign sites, free account 34%
Campaign sites, Plus account 22%
Local news, free account 34%
Local news, Plus account 38%

Claude

Claude: free and paid accounts
Campaign sites, free account 2%
Campaign sites, Pro account 3%
Local news, free account 66%
Local news, Pro account 65%

ChatGPT free vs Plus: on our daily questions, mostly from October. The gap was smaller on Nov 2–3, on few answers, and did not appear in other questions we asked on Nov 3.

ChatGPT web figures count only the links our tool captured, a subset of those shown.

Web vs API data through November 3, 2026; free vs paid through November 3, 2026. Gemini's web app and Grok's free tier are not included because we do not have comparable answers.

What AI cites in each state's top races

  • AK39
  • ME47
  • WI58
  • VT50
  • NH31
  • WA
  • ID36
  • MT49
  • ND
  • MN30
  • IL49
  • MI29
  • NY38
  • MA33
  • OR41
  • NV40
  • WY60
  • SD42
  • IA41
  • IN
  • OH32
  • PA65
  • NJ29
  • CT49
  • RI33
  • CA48
  • UT
  • CO30
  • NE49
  • MO
  • KY35
  • WV29
  • VA50
  • MD35
  • DE44
  • AZ39
  • NM34
  • KS43
  • AR33
  • TN29
  • NC28
  • SC37
  • DC
  • OK34
  • LA41
  • MS42
  • AL42
  • GA47
  • HI34
  • TX25
  • FL29

Percent of cited links in each state's Senate and governor races, on one question asked in every race. Shares depend on how we classify each outlet. Each developer version counts equally. Dashed tiles rest on a single race; grey tiles have no statewide race we followed. A figure describes these contests, not the state as a whole, and darker tiles are relative to the highest value on each map.

How we did it

We recorded the pages each answer linked to and sorted each website into a type, such as local news or campaign site. These figures count links an answer cites, not pages a chatbot consulted but did not cite. Read our methods or the method notes.

What comes next

We are now checking the sources themselves: which local outlets are established newsrooms, how new the websites are, and how the national outlets cited compare with the ones Americans read most.

See the full results

Sign in to explore sources over time and race by race, look up any website, read each answer with its links, and download the data.

Sign in to explore the data